Neuroscience - AI Training - Liverpool, UK

Review AI-generated graphical abstracts against neuroscience research papers to assess whether the summaries accurately reflect the science. This is a flexible, remote, ad hoc evaluation project focused on preserving the factual and structural integrity of technical research communication.

• Read scientific papers alongside the graphical abstracts produced from them.
• Check whether the abstracts represent the source paper’s findings and concepts accurately.
• Identify factual errors, omissions, or distortions in the text or visual presentation.
• Apply neuroscience expertise to judge whether complex ideas have been summarized appropriately.

• Master’s or PhD in neuroscience or a related field.
• Deep subject knowledge in neuroscience and the ability to work through dense scientific literature.
• Strong analytical skills, attention to detail, and experience with fact-checking.
• Pass a paid skills assessment using a sample paper and graphical abstract.

• Experience evaluating or training AI systems.
• Background in scientific publishing or peer review.

• Remote, flexible, ad hoc work.
• Advertised pay starts at $40 per hour.