BigLaw lawyers; Litigation​/Corporate​/M&A)

Big Law lawyers (Litigation/Corporate/M&A) is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs in litigation workflows. Reviewers grade citation accuracy, statutory reasoning, and policy adherence; flag risk; and document the corrected analysis so the modeling team can train on it.

Category:
Legal & Policy AI Evaluation
· Pay: $50 / hr
·

Location:

Remote — US-eligible
· Contractor

Big Law lawyers (Litigation/Corporate/M&A) is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs in litigation workflows.

Big Law lawyers (Litigation/Corporate/M&A) is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs in litigation workflows. Reviewers grade citation accuracy, statutory reasoning, and policy adherence; flag risk; and document the corrected analysis so the modeling team can train on it.
Litigation content is judged on precision. Aura One uses qualified legal and policy reviewers to grade AI outputs the way a senior associate would — with citations, severity tags, and the corrected reasoning alongside the original.
Judge legal, policy, and compliance outputs for precision and risk.

• Review AI outputs against current litigation statutes, case law, or policy for Big Law lawyers (Litigation/Corporate/M&A) assignments.
• Verify citations, jurisdictions, and dates against authoritative sources.
• Flag risky reasoning, missed exceptions, and policy-adherence gaps with severity tags.
• Capture the corrected analysis or memo paragraph so the modeling team can train on it.
• Adjudicate disputed treatments against published authority or firm policy.

Track Legal & policy review Work model Remote
· Independent specialist contractor Compensation Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process. Eligible from US

• Active or recent qualification in litigation or an adjacent practice for Big Law lawyers (Litigation/Corporate/M&A) work.
• Hands-on experience drafting, reviewing, or advising on real matters.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that cites authority and names the rule being applied.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

• Verify the citations in a model's litigation memo and flag any miscites with severity.
• Grade a model's statutory reasoning on a complex fact pattern and rate the analysis.
• Adjudicate a disputed treatment between two reviewers using current authority.
• Audit a 25-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.

• Bar admission or legal-equivalent credential in a relevant jurisdiction.
• Prior experience reviewing AI-assisted legal-research or compliance tooling.
• Bilingual experience for cross-jurisdiction matters.

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

• Legal research
• Citation review
• Statutory analysis
• Policy reasoning
• Litigation

Creating a specialist profile records your experience and preferences. Starting role intake is a separate action that attaches this role to your candidate record.

The intake preserves your chosen role, the visible terms, and source attribution for reviewer context.
- 01 Confirm profile and eligibility details.
- 02 Attach this role deliberately.
- 03 Receive a human review decision or follow-up.
Placement timing depends on program demand and reviewer confirmation.