AI Trainer - Neuroscience; Fully Remote- Edinburgh

Review neuroscience research and assess whether AI-generated graphical abstracts represent the underlying science accurately. This is flexible, remote, ad hoc evaluation work focused on scientific accuracy and clear communication of technical ideas.

• Compare research papers with graphical abstracts generated from those papers.
• Identify factual errors, omissions, or misleading representations in the abstracts.
• Check whether scientific concepts are conveyed accurately in both text and visuals.
• Apply specialist knowledge and careful judgment to each evaluation.

• A master’s or doctoral degree in neuroscience or a related field.
• Deep knowledge of neuroscience and the ability to work with dense scientific literature.
• Experience with fact-checking or similar analytical work.
• Strong attention to detail when assessing scientific claims and visual summaries.
• Successful completion of a paid assessment using a sample paper and graphical abstract.

• Previous experience evaluating or training AI systems.
• Experience with scientific publishing or peer review.

• Remote, flexible, ad hoc project work.
• The listing states pay of $40 or more per hour for project work.