Neuroscience - AI Training - Minneapolis

Help assess the reliability of AI-generated neuroscience summaries by checking graphical abstracts against their underlying scientific papers. The project involves detailed scientific review and expert judgment, with flexible, ad hoc work that can be completed remotely.

• Read source papers and compare them with associated AI-generated graphical abstracts.
• Review the accuracy and organization of each summary.
• Spot factual errors or representations that do not faithfully match the research.
• Verify the presentation of scientific concepts in both visual and written form.

• Deep expertise in neuroscience or a related discipline.
• A master’s or PhD in neuroscience or a related field.
• Strong attention to detail and analytical ability.
• Experience conducting fact-checking or similar evaluative work.
• Pass a paid skills assessment involving a sample paper and graphical abstract.

• Previous AI training or evaluation work.
• Familiarity with scientific publishing or peer review.

• Remote assignments with flexible, ad hoc hours.
• Advertised compensation starts at $40 per hour.