Neuroscience - AI Training - Memphis

Review AI-produced graphical abstracts for scientific integrity, using neuroscience knowledge to compare them with the original research. This is a remote, flexible advisory project offered on an ad hoc basis, suited to specialists comfortable assessing dense scientific material.

• Examine scientific papers alongside their AI-generated graphical summaries.
• Determine whether the summary’s structure and claims match the source paper.
• Identify inaccuracies and instances where the abstract misrepresents the findings.
• Check that technical neuroscience ideas are conveyed correctly through words and visuals.

• Strong subject matter expertise in neuroscience or a related area.
• A master’s or doctoral qualification in neuroscience or a related field.
• A careful, analytical approach to evaluating scientific claims.
• Prior experience with fact-checking tasks or equivalent review.
• Successful completion of a paid assessment using a sample paper and graphical abstract.

• Experience with AI model training or evaluation.
• Scientific publishing or peer review experience.

• Flexible, remote, ad hoc assignments.
• Advertised pay is $40 per hour or more.