Digital Forensics Lead (CBP

About Agile Defense

At Agile Defense we know that action defines the outcome and new challenges require new solutions. That’s why we always look to the future and embrace change with an unmovable spirit and the courage to build for what comes next.

Our vision is to bring adaptive innovation to support our nation's most important missions through the seamless integration of advanced technologies, elite minds, and unparalleled agility—leveraging a foundation of speed, flexibility, and ingenuity to strengthen and protect our nation’s vital interests.

Title:

Digital Forensics Lead (CBP)

Clearance:
Active CBP Background Investigation (CBP BI) and EOD strongly preferred. We can begin processing for candidates who do not hold one.

Citizenship: U.S. Citizenship required

Location:

Ashburn, VA
- Hybrid

Salary Range: [pending]

Signing Bonus: $10,000 for candidates with an active CBP BI. Payable after 90 days; standard terms apply.

Travel:
Rare, as needed

U.S. Customs and Border Protection runs continuous operations across more than 300 land, air, and sea ports of entry, plus Border Patrol stations and the Air and Marine Operations Center. When something happens on a system supporting that mission, whether it is a confirmed intrusion, an insider case, or an incident that is still being scoped, the question everyone eventually asks is the same: what actually happened, and can you prove it.

Getting that answer right, in a way that holds up, is what this role exists to do. You lead digital forensics for this program. You will preserve and analyze evidence from compromised or suspect systems, reconstruct what happened, and produce findings the incident response, threat hunt, and insider threat monitoring leads can act on and that can support disciplinary, legal, or law enforcement action when it comes to that.

One thing is worth knowing before you apply. A forensic finding that cannot survive scrutiny is worse than no finding at all, because someone will have already acted on it. Chain of custody and defensible process are not paperwork here. They are the difference between a finding that holds and one that does not.

Objective 1:
Preserve evidence well enough that findings hold up under scrutiny

• Evidence handling follows chain of custody every time, not only when a case looks like it will matter.
• Your process would survive being challenged by someone whose job is to find the flaw in it.
• Nothing you needed for an analysis is missing because it was not preserved in time.

Objective 2:
Reconstruct what actually happened, not just what is easy to prove

• Your analysis answers the question that was actually asked, not the version of it that was easiest to investigate.
• Where evidence is ambiguous, you say so rather than rounding up to a conclusion the evidence does not fully support.
• Timelines you build reconcile activity across systems rather than describing one system in isolation.

Objective 3:
Deliver findings other teams and outside parties can actually use

• Incident response, threat hunt, and insider threat monitoring get findings framed for what they need to act, not a raw technical dump.
• Findings that support disciplinary, legal, or law enforcement action are documented to the standard those processes require.
• You can explain a technical finding to a non-technical decision maker without losing what matters about it.

Objective 4:
Build a forensics capability that gets faster and more reliable over time

• Case types that recur get a faster, more consistent process each time, not reinvestigated from scratch.
• Tooling and technique choices get reviewed against what actually worked in real cases.
• Lessons from a case change the program's practice, not just that one investigation.

Preferred…