Nonprofit ​/ philanthropy ​/ community programs Evaluator

Nonprofit / philanthropy / community programs Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing nonprofit / philanthropy / community programs evaluation prompts and responses against Aura One's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

AI data reviewers help turn nonprofit / philanthropy / community programs evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for Aura One Human Data.

• Evaluate nonprofit / philanthropy / community programs evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Nonprofit / philanthropy / community programs Evaluator assignments.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
• Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run.

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on nonprofit / philanthropy / community programs evaluation or adjacent content for Nonprofit / philanthropy / community programs Evaluator work.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

• Compare two nonprofit / philanthropy / community programs evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.
• Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
• Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
• Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

• Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
• Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
• Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss.

• Model output evaluation
• Rubric-based annotation
• Severity tagging
• Inter-rater calibration
• Nonprofit / philanthropy / community programs evaluation

Remote - US-eligible. Remote Independent specialist contractor.

Employment type:

CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

$80-$120 / hr