Meaningful Connectivity Research Consultant

The Opportunity

This research examines how emergency connectivity support is structured today and what gaps remain for frontline responders. Using a literature review and case study methodology, it will generate evidence on what "meaningful connectivity" looks like across emergency response contexts, and provide recommendations for more effective support structures. This work recognizes that meaningful connectivity spans the full humanitarian-development continuum, before, during, and after a crisis, not just its acute phase.

• Document how connectivity in emergency response has evolved and what it means in practice today across international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), local and national organizations, and affected communities, including the evolution of Net Hope's work in this area.
• Examine the roles of the private sector in shaping connectivity resourcing models, and the ethical and technical implications associated with their adoption in the humanitarian sector.
• Document the connectivity technology needs of the frontline responders across international NGOs, local and national organizations, and affected communities and their change over the years.
• Document how the frontline responders across international NGOs, local and national organizations, and affected communities are currently covering their connectivity technology needs, and the existing gaps remaining.
• Assess existing funding models (e.g., pre-positioned equipment, cash grants, pre-approved procurement windows), including Net Hope’s models, and how they align with the needs of frontline responders.
• Analyze evidence from Net Hope’s emergency response program as embedded case studies of varying types and contexts of emergency connectivity resourcing.
• Produce actionable recommendations and evidence products for future emergency response programming at Net Hope, and the broader humanitarian connectivity sector.

The central research question is:

How has connectivity in humanitarian emergency response evolved, and where does the sector stand in terms of achieving "meaningful connectivity" today?

• How do connectivity needs and constraints compare across international NGOs, local/national/regional NGOs, and community-based organizations?
• To what extent have preparedness and response investments reduced the duration and severity of connectivity loss during recent emergencies, compared to prior years?
• What specific technical, logistical, or funding barriers explain the persistence of last-mile gaps, even where broader country-level connectivity has improved?
• What funding and procurement models exist to support the work of frontline responders and the communities they serve, and what are the observed results?
• How do different support models (on-site technical support, in-kind donations, preparedness grants, response grants) perform across the preparedness, response, and recovery phases? Across conflict and post-conflict emergencies?
• What evidence from Net Hope’s own programming shows which support models (on-site technical support, in-kind donations, preparedness grants, response grants) are most effective in which contexts, and where models may need to be combined rather than used in isolation?
• What role do private sector actors (donors and vendors) play in enabling or constraining this mix of models, and what tradeoffs come with relying on them?
• How can connectivity investment and technology be structured to better serve communities across the preparedness, response, and recovery phases of an emergency?
• How are internet shutdowns and restrictive government policies in the selected disaster-prone or at‑risk case study locations reshaping connectivity strategies, and do…