×
Register Here to Apply for Jobs or Post Jobs. X
More jobs:

Operational Risk

Job in Dallas, Dallas County, Texas, 75215, USA
Listing for: Goldman Sachs Bank AG
Full Time position
Listed on 2026-06-04
Job specializations:
  • Software Development
    AI Engineer
Salary/Wage Range or Industry Benchmark: 150000 - 200000 USD Yearly USD 150000.00 200000.00 YEAR
Job Description & How to Apply Below

Job Title

Risk, Operational Risk (Artificial Intelligence Coverage), Vice President, Dallas or Salt Lake City  Dallas, Texas, United States

Team / Role

Lead for AI Architecture – Artificial Intelligence Coverage / Operational Risk

Level/Location

Vice President, Dallas/ Salt Lake City

The Operational Risk Department at Goldman Sachs is an independent risk management function responsible for developing and implementing a standardized framework to identify, measure, and monitor operational risk across the firm. The AI Lead for AI Architecture is a specialized role within this framework, dedicated to strengthening the firm's oversight of AI-related risks arising from model development, deployment infrastructure, technical standards, and the internal AI technology stack.

This professional will be responsible for continuously identifying, monitoring, measuring, and assessing operational risks associated with the firm’s AI architecture decisions, including secure‑by‑design principles, model governance within the tech stack, infrastructure resilience, explainability, data quality and drift, prompt injection defenses, and the alignment of technical architecture with the firm’s AI risk appetite. The role ensures that the firm’s AI systems are architected, deployed, and operated in a manner that is secure, resilient, explainable, and compliant with regulatory obligations.

Responsibilities
  • Identify, monitor, and analyze operational risks arising from the design, development, and deployment of AI systems, with a focus on risks such as inadequate system alignment, lack of explainability, data quality and drift, prompt injection, hallucination and inaccurate outputs, non‑deterministic behavior, bias and discrimination, model overreach/expanded use, reputational risk from AI failures, agent action authorization bypass, tool chain manipulation and injection, agent state persistence poisoning, and multi‑agent trust boundary violations.

    Develop evidence‑based challenges focused on improving architectural risk posture.
  • Monitor the firm's AI architecture control inventory for sufficiency and completeness, challenging the absence of controls and the implementation of controls within engineering standards. This includes oversight of mitigations such as AI Firewall Implementation and Management, User/App/Model Firewalling/Filtering, AI System Observability, System Acceptance Testing, Data Quality and Classification/Sensitivity, Human Feedback Loop for AI Systems, LLM‑as‑a‑Judge automated evaluation, Providing Citations and Source Traceability, AI Model Version Pinning, Agent Authority Least Privilege Framework, Tool Chain Validation and Sanitization, Agent Decision Audit and Explainability, Multi‑Agent Isolation and Segmentation, Data Filtering From External Knowledge Bases, Preserving Source Data Access Controls in AI Systems, Role‑Based Access Control for AI Data, Encryption of AI Data at Rest, and Quality of Service and DDoS Prevention for AI Systems.
  • Champion secure‑by‑design principles across the AI technology stack, ensuring that security, privacy, and risk controls are embedded into AI system architecture from inception rather than retrofitted.
  • Conduct data analysis to identify trends and patterns in AI system performance, model behavior, observability telemetry, and security events, augmenting such analysis with qualitative observations to monitor risk‑taking trends through bespoke metrics at firmwide and divisional/sub‑divisional levels. Escalate concerns to senior management when warranted.
  • Contribute to divisional and functional risk profile assessments by highlighting AI architecture risk issues and trends to senior divisional managers and the senior Operational Risk management team.
  • Conduct evidence‑based scenario analysis by working with stakeholders to develop plausible tail risk scenarios around AI architecture failures, including prompt injection attacks leading to data exfiltration, hallucination‑driven erroneous financial advice, cascading failures in multi‑agent systems, agent authorization bypass leading to unauthorized transactions, data drift causing model degradation, and infrastructure resilience…
To View & Apply for jobs on this site that accept applications from your location or country, tap the button below to make a Search.
(If this job is in fact in your jurisdiction, then you may be using a Proxy or VPN to access this site, and to progress further, you should change your connectivity to another mobile device or PC).
 
 
 
Search for further Jobs Here:
(Try combinations for better Results! Or enter less keywords for broader Results)
Location
Increase/decrease your Search Radius (miles)
0
200
Filters
Education Level
Experience Level (years)
Posted in last:
Salary