Child Safety Risk Evaluator

Child Safety Risk Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing child safety risk evaluation prompts and responses against Aura One's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

AI data reviewers help turn child safety risk evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for Aura One Human Data.

• Evaluate child safety risk evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Child Safety Risk Evaluator assignments.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
• Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run.

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on child safety risk evaluation or adjacent content for Child Safety Risk Evaluator work.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

• Compare two child safety risk evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.
• Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
• Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
• Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

• Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
• Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
• Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss.

• Model output evaluation
• Rubric-based annotation
• Severity tagging
• Inter-rater calibration
• Child Safety Risk evaluation
• AI safety
• Red-team evaluation
• Policy rubrics
• Child
• Safety

Remote — US-eligible. Remote
· Independent specialist contractor.

Employment type:

CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.

Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on child safety risk evaluation or adjacent content for Child Safety Risk Evaluator work. Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches. Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied. Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem. Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.