Safety Systems Engineer, SW Integrity

Who we are

Aurora’s mission is to deliver the benefits of self-driving technology safely, quickly, and broadly. The Aurora Driver will create a new era in mobility and logistics, one that will bring a safer, more efficient, and more accessible future to everyone.

At Aurora, you will tackle massively complex problems alongside other passionate, intelligent individuals, growing as an expert while expanding your knowledge. For the latest news from Aurora, visit aurora.tech or follow us on Linked In.

This role is within Aurora's Systems and Safety Engineering Organization, which is responsible for the engineering work of designing and developing architecture, algorithms, and tools needed to ensure that the Self Driving Vehicle meets Aurora's Safety Case – an unsolved problem for the industry and one of the most difficult challenges in the history of systems/safety engineering. Our team is responsible for understanding the functionality of the autonomy stack and helping to define operational parameters and strategies important to maintain safe driving conditions.

The successful candidate will be a self-starter and able to work independently, learn, tailor and execute processes, and perform in a collaborative environment.

The Staff Systems and Safety Engineer – Software Integrity is responsible for owning and leading the organization’s software development process and its integrity. This role ensures alignment of the SW development process with ISO 26262, Automotive SPICE (ASPICE), and internal best practices, while thoughtfully tailoring industry best practices to both deterministic and probabilistic software systems. Operating at the intersection of software engineering, systems engineering, safety, quality, and risk management, this role provides technical leadership and cross-functional alignment to ensure software integrity, risk transparency, and release readiness in complex, safety-critical environments.

• Lead Software Development Process including ASPICE Conformance
• Lead the end-to-end software development process, ensuring it is well‑defined, scalable, and consistently applied across programs.
• Align software processes with ISO 26262 and ASPICE, ensuring both compliance and practical adoption by engineering teams.
• Continuously evaluate and improve processes to balance rigor, efficiency, and engineering effectiveness.
• Serve as the single point of conformance (SPC) for software process integrity.
• Interpret and apply ISO 26262 and ASPICE requirements across:
  • Deterministic software systems
  • Probabilistic and learning‑based software systems
• Lead the tailoring of standard expectations—such as code coverage, design traceability, and verification & validation (V&V)—to ensure they meet the intent of the standards while remaining technically appropriate for probabilistic behavior.
• Support Risk Assessment & Safety Case Alignment
  • Collaborate as the SPC for software risk assessment, ensuring risks are systematically identified, analyzed, monitored, and managed throughout the development lifecycle.
  • Act as a key liaison to the Safety organization on the Safety case, ensuring that the system safety process deliverables are integrated with the safety case as evidence
  • Provide expert guidance on what constitutes sufficient evidence, rationale, and justification for compliance.
  • Collaborate with Safety on topics like Regulatory Compliance, Anomaly Management, etc.

• Degree in Engineering, Computer Science, Robotics, or a related field
• Five or more years experience in a safety critical industry with safety‑critical software development standards, and requirements‑driven software verification and validation strategies
• Significant experience in software systems engineering, software process definition, software quality, or safety‑critical development.
• Strong working knowledge of:
  • Automotive SPICE (ASPICE)
  • Proficiency in ISO 26262
• Demonstrated understanding of the differences between deterministic and probabilistic software, particularly related to:
  • Code coverage strategies
  • Requirements and design traceability
  • Verification and validation approaches
• Experience with risk assessments and safety cases.
• Com…