Principal Product Manager, Finance

Position Overview

We are looking for a Finance Technology Principal Product Manager to lead the end‑to‑end Finance Close product strategy, with a specific focus on close process transformation, capability ownership, operational scalability, and M&A integration readiness. This role will sit at the intersection of Finance, Accounting, Tax, Treasury, FP&A, Corporate Development, Legal, Enterprise Applications, Engineering, Enterprise Architecture, and Business Architecture. It will help define how Autodesk improves, automates, governs, and scales the Finance Close process across a complex global systems landscape.

Ideal candidates understand the full close lifecycle across upstream transactions, subledger activity, reconciliations, intercompany, consolidations, revenue recognition, tax, treasury, reporting, controls, and management reporting; can identify process gaps, clarify ownership, define capability roadmaps, and translate Finance priorities into clear product requirements and execution plans. They will also play a key role in supporting mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, and legal entity integrations to ensure acquired businesses can be onboarded into Autodesk’s finance ecosystem in a scalable, compliant, and operationally sustainable way.

• Lead the Finance Technology product strategy for end-to-end close transformation, including process simplification, automation, control readiness, reporting dependencies, and system enablement
• Develop and maintain a Finance Close capability roadmap that aligns Finance priorities, business process ownership, technical delivery, and enterprise architecture direction
• Partner with Accounting, Tax, Treasury, FP&A, Revenue, Billing, Collections, Procurement, Corporate Development, Legal, IT, Engineering, and Business Architecture to identify close process gaps, ownership gaps, integration issues, and automation opportunities
• Work with other product managers and define product requirements across core finance capabilities, including Record to Report, Order to Cash, Procure to Pay, Tax, Treasury, Revenue Recognition, Intercompany, FP&A, Billing, Collections, Consolidations, and Management Reporting
• Assess the end-to-end close process to identify manual workarounds, duplicated effort, reconciliation gaps, reporting dependencies, control weaknesses, data quality issues, and opportunities to improve close cycle time
• Translate complex business, accounting, tax, treasury, compliance, and reporting needs into clear product requirements, process designs, capability maps, integration requirements, and delivery priorities
• Create a cross-functional decision framework for Finance Close capabilities, including clear ownership, intake, prioritization, readiness criteria, release planning, UAT expectations, and business sign-off
• Lead Finance Technology planning for M&A integration, including due diligence support, Day 1 readiness, interim operating models, stabilization, and full systems integration
• Evaluate whether acquired businesses should be integrated immediately into core finance platforms or supported through interim models such as manual postings, legacy ERP extracts, transition service agreements, bridge reporting, or phased integration
• Own the finance systems integration roadmap for acquired entities, including ERP onboarding, legal entity setup, chart of accounts alignment, intercompany requirements, banking readiness, tax configuration, revenue recognition impacts, reporting integration, and close process readiness
• Partner with Enterprise Architecture and Engineering to define scalable integration patterns for acquired‑company data, financial transactions, master data, reporting, controls, reconciliations, and system cutover
• Drive alignment on finance master data decisions, including legal entities, customers, vendors, products, cost centers, profit centers, tax registrations, bank accounts, payment methods, reporting hierarchies, and consolidation requirements
• Where needed, support M&A due diligence by assessing finance systems complexity, integration risk, compliance exposure, data quality, reporting gaps, close readiness, and long‑term operational…