Member of Technical Staff; Data Scientist, Evals

About the Role

Perplexity serves tens of millions of users daily with reliable, high-quality answers grounded in an LLM-first search engine and our specialized data sources. We aim to use the latest models as they are released, but the intelligence frontier is a jagged one, and popular benchmarks do not effectively cover our use cases. In this role, you will build specialized evals to improve answer quality across Perplexity, covering search-based LLM answers and other scenarios popular with our users.

• Architect and maintain automated evaluation pipelines to assess answer quality across Perplexity's products, ensuring high standards for accuracy and helpfulness
• Design evaluation sets and methods specifically to measure the impact of tool calls (particularly web search retrieval) on the final answer's quality
• Develop VLM-based solutions to programmatically evaluate how final answers render visually across different platforms and devices
• Continuously review public benchmarks and academic evaluations for their applicability to the Perplexity product, adapting and incorporating them into our regular performance measurements
• Operate within a small, high-impact team where your evaluation metrics directly shape product changes, collaborating closely with technical leadership to measure and improve Answer Quality

• PhD or MS in a technical field or equivalent experience
• 4+ years of experience in data science or machine learning
• Strong proficiency in Python and SQL (expected to write production-grade code)
• Experience building within a modern cloud data stack, specifically AWS and Databricks
• Comfortable with agentic coding workflows and using AI-assisted development tools to iterate faster

• 1+ years of experience working with LLMs at scale, specifically with LLM-as-a-judge setups
• Prior experience working on customer-facing web products or consumer apps, with real user traffic at scale
• A strong research background, with experience applying research methods to real-world ML problems
• Experience defining evaluation metrics (e.g., factual consistency, hallucination rate, retrieval precision) and building ground truth datasets