External Peer Reviewer for Updated Healthcare Curriculum Development

Organisation/Company Petre Shotadze Tbilisi Medical Academy Research Field Other Researcher Profile Established Researcher (R3) Positions Other Positions Final date to receive applications 20 Aug 2026 - 00:01 (Europe/Brussels) Country Georgia Type of Contract Temporary Job Status Not Applicable Offer Starting Date 1 Sep 2026 Is the job funded through the EU Research Framework Programme? Erasmus+ Reference Number GA  Is the Job related to staff position within a Research Infrastructure?

No

Petre Shotadze Tbilisi Medical Academy LLC, coordinator of the Erasmus+ CBHE project

Digi-CHange - Digital Transformation and Curriculum Development for Healthcare Teams, invites qualified independent experts to apply for the role of External Peer Reviewer.
The assignment is linked toS
1.1 - Peer Reviewand focuses on the independent review of curriculum-related materials developed under

Task 1.2 - Development of an Updated Healthcare Curriculum.
Relevant expertise may include medical or nursing education, healthcare curriculum development, digital health education, competency-based education, interprofessional education, quality assurance or evaluation of educational programmes.

Research Field Medical sciences » Health sciences Education Level PhD or equivalent

Research Field Educational sciences » Education Education Level PhD or equivalent

Applicants should demonstrate relevant expertise in one or more of the following areas:

• medical education;
• competency-based education;
• quality assurance in higher education;
• peer review or evaluation of educational programmes.

Experience with international education projects, Erasmus+ projects, digital health competencies or curriculum reform will be considered an advantage.

Applicants are expected to briefly demonstrate their expertise through relevant examples, such as participation in curriculum development or curriculum review processes, evaluation of educational programmes or projects, development of teaching and learning materials, quality assurance activities, relevant publications, conference papers, reports, training experience or similar professional assignments.

Specific Requirements

Experience with international education projects, Erasmus+ projects, digital health competencies or curriculum reform will be considered an advantage.

Applicants are expected to briefly demonstrate their expertise through relevant examples, such as participation in curriculum development or curriculum review processes, evaluation of educational programmes or projects, development of teaching and learning materials, quality assurance activities, relevant publications, conference papers, reports, training experience or similar professional assignments.

Languages ENGLISH Level Excellent

Research Field Medical sciences » Other Educational sciences » Other Years of Research Experience 4 - 10

The purpose of this assignment is to provide an independent external peer review of the draft output developed under Task 1.2 - Development of an Updated Healthcare Curriculum.

The selected expert will assess the quality, relevance, coherence and practical applicability of the draft curriculum-related materials and will provide recommendations for improvement before finalisation.

The external peer reviewer will be expected to:

• review the draft curriculum-related document and supporting materials provided by TMA;
• assess the relevance of the proposed approach to medical and nursing education;
• assess the integration of digital health concepts and competencies;
• review the clarity, coherence, completeness and practical usability of the proposed curriculum approach;
• identify strengths, gaps and areas requiring clarification;
• provide practical recommendations for improvement;
• submit a written peer-review report in English;
• participate in one online clarification meeting, if requested.

Applicants should demonstrate relevant expertise in one or more of the following areas:

• medical education;
• competency-based education;
• quality assurance in higher education;
• peer review or evaluation of educational programmes.

Experience with international education projects, Erasmus+ projects, digital health competencies or curriculum reform will be considered an advantage.

Applications will be evaluated by an Evaluation Committee appointed by TMA. The Committee will assess each application against the criteria listed below, using a scoring scale from 1 to 5, where 1 represents the lowest score and 5 represents the highest score.

Score - Indicative weighting

1 - Very weak compliance with the criterion

2
- Limited compliance with the criterion

3 - Satisfactory compliance with the criterion

4 - Good compliance with the criterion

5 - Excellent compliance with the criterion

Each criterion will be scored from 1 to 5 and then converted into weighted points according to the weighting indicated below.

Relevant qualifications and expertise - 30%

Experience in healthcare curriculum…